Current Events · Mother India · Personal reflections · Words of The Mother and Sri Aurobindo

Reading Political Speeches – 2



Sri Aurobindo Alipore Jail 1908
Sri Aurobindo, 1909 (Alipore jail)


I became more at ease when I accepted a partly-colonized, partly-decolonized consciousness as part of the modern day educated Indian experience. I felt mentally calm enough to accept that it is part of how I interpret my experience and that of others. But I also realized that this was not the only way to make sense of my own limited understanding. And that there can be a whole other way to understand all of this.

I remembered that somewhere in his writings Sri Aurobindo speaks of politicization of mind and political mindset being one of the worst outcomes of materialistic modernity and modern, rationalistic education. Yet that is an essential stage in our human evolution, as his uniquely inclusive and integral approach to life-affirming spirituality also reminds us. The challenge is to transcend the limits of a rational-externalised view of life and gradually move to a more spiritualised inner view of life – all life, which does not reject any human activity or pursuit but uplifts and raises everything to its noblest and inmost purpose and place in the wider existence. 

With that in mind, I felt a deep sense of understanding when I read Sri Aurobindo’s political speeches and writings where he talks about Swaraj, his vision for a political future of the modern nation-state of India, and his true understanding of what Indian nation could mean for its people. This Indian nation would not be a colonial copy but one that is grounded in a deeper and truer vision that is indigenous to Indian civilization, is eternal yet newly evolving, rooted in its timelessness yet inclusive and integrative of all that continues to come from the world outside.

To what extent Indian people and successive governments elected by the Indian people have dedicated themselves to working toward that vision, to what extent we have even understood that vision – these are questions deserving deep reflection and analysis. But if I were to quickly give an answer right now, I would have to say that unfortunately over most of the last seven decades, the free and independent India has witnessed consistent attempts by her political, bureaucratic and intellectual classes to undermine her civilizational and cultural identity. Not only that, these classes have also managed to thrust upon her an artificial veneer of mindless and rootless modernism which is not consistent with the trajectory of Indian historical-social-cultural-political evolution.




Reading Sri Aurobindo’s political speeches and writings also made me think of some wider issues concerning the impact of colonial thinking on how the Indian State works. There are still plenty of laws existing from the British colonial days, but even that is only a small matter. The bigger one is the growing awareness in small sections of Indian intellectual classes that a lot of political unrest and social conflict in India is the result of Indians’ lack of understanding of how Indian collective psyche and lived experience clash with the European/Western ideas of ‘nation-state,’ ‘religion’, ‘secularism’ ‘multiculturalism,’ and ‘tolerance.’

For example, the modern idea of nation-state initially grew up in mono-religious, homogenous societies whereas India has always been (from ancient times) a highly diverse, heterogeneous society with deep underlying unity of vision and thought. But this inner unity manifests itself in diverse outside forms, practices, traditions and ways of life. Sri Aurobindo’s theoretical distinction between peoples and nations is helpful here, which is also somewhat similar to Tagore’s view on the idea of nationalism.

Even to this day one can see tremendous socio-cultural diversity in many aspects of Indian life and living as one travels from village to village or town to town. At the same time can be seen the crushing impact of the widening reach of Western-style materialist-rationalistic modernity which by its default nature tends to homogenize things. The combined push-pull kind of force of a culturally-grounded, organic-holistic-integrated view of life and a circumstantially-commercially-imposed outlook that is often contrary or at least divergent from what the Indian collective psyche has been accustomed to since ages is causing much unrest – psychologically, socially, politically, and culturally.

As I reflected more I realized that while this very Western idea of nation-state may have been imposed on India, there have also been thinkers like Sri Aurobindo who remind us of the psychological rather than the physical principle as the foundation of nationality. Nationhood, according to him, refers primarily to the notion of psychological unity which, in turn, might be heightened by common collective memories of ancient traditions, past heroes and sufferings, by common geographical habitation and by common interests and values.

“[T]he nation is a persistent psychological unit which Nature has been busy developing throughout the world in the most various forms and educating into physical and political unity… All modern attempts to destroy by force or break up a nation are foolish and futile, because they ignore the law of natural evolution. Empires are still perishable political units; the nation is immortal.” (Sri Aurobindo, The Ideal of Human Unity)

This emphasis on national ‘spirit’ (and spirit by its nature will be manifested in innumerable outer forms) and on an inner psychological unity helps me see that it is these ideas that we need to hold on to in order to prevent Indian nation-state from becoming a dominating, imposing type of monolith that might suffocate or brutally eradicate the rich diversity that exists in various nooks and corners of India. At the same time, this view that makes us realize the inner significance of the idea of nation will also make us see that becoming a nation in this sense (modern as it may be) is an essential step in our ongoing collective path to renew and relive the truths of our golden past.

“Nations do not prosper without self-sacrifice…. The self-respect of the nation is our religion, self-sacrifice is our only action or duty. We ought to give proper scope for the divine qualities in us to shine forth. Trifling emotions ought to be given up. Do not be afraid even if you are required to die. Do not retreat; bear pain for the sake of the nation. God is your support. If you do this, the Indian nation will, in an instant, get back its former splendour and glory. It will take its place at the side of the independent nations of the world; it will educate other nations; it will shed the lustre of true knowledge, and it will inculcate the principles of Vedanta. Our nation will come forward to benefit the human race and the whole world. Before it the whole world will tremble! But when? Only when we all are prepared to repay our debt to the nation.” (Speech delivered on 31st January, 1908)


Have you read Part 1?

9 thoughts on “Reading Political Speeches – 2

  1. Nice post Beloo…which made to think about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism, we are constantly evaluating other cultures with our own perceptions and passing judgement on them eventually to adopt and adapt and in the process forgetting our rich traditions and heritage.

    1. Thanks Sunita. I am happy you found the post thought-provoking. We really do need to recall and regain our identity and learn to find answers to our problems in the vast knowledge systems that emerged from our cultural traditions. Nothing has to be accepted in a blind way, but everything has to be evaluated and judged for its relevance for our modern problems and times. I believe there is a lot of wisdom that our ancient seers and thinkers have given us but somehow we haven’t been able to tap into that to make it relevant for our times. Instead we have been blindly copying from others. This must change if we have to truly awaken to our strengths, as individuals and as a civilisation and nation.

  2. I reckon this sums up the difference between the thought processes of leaders back then and now : ““Nations do not prosper without self-sacrifice…. The self-respect of the nation is our religion, self-sacrifice is our only action or duty. ” Actually of the citizens too, if you come to think about it.

    1. Yes, you are right, those leaders were indeed leaders. Not politicians. They were ready to give up everything for the sake of the country, not wheeling-dealing (though there were some in those days also who did that but that’s human nature I suppose, not everyone can rise up to their best!). And I agree completely about the citizens also being ready to sacrifice for the sake of the nation. Sadly that spirit is fading away, has been fading away for a long time now, what with all the sense of entitlement, rights-based polity etc….Hopefully a new awakening will come. For India and for the world. Thanks for reading and for your wonderful comment.

  3. Enjoyed your introspection Beloo. With the current interconnectedness of the world, it’s probably but natural to be inundated with the influx of other cultures, religions and beliefs. The moot point then becomes how does one preserve ones identity and yet be tolerant and welcoming of diverse beliefs. If we had not had the colonial past, we would have been very different people.

    1. Yes, you make a very good point. We would have been very different people if we had not been colonised. But who knows what we would have been like. In hindsight, there must have been some grand plan of Nature to give this nation that kind of an experience. Just like an individual’s life is connected with the larger collective, so is a nation’s collective life connected to that of the world and the larger humanity. Who knows what grand experiment is being carried out by Nature through the different experiences being played out in different parts of the world, all of which are all part of one single humanity.

      Thanks for reading this post and for your thoughtful comment. Much appreciated.

Response? Reaction? Thought? Question? Criticism? Let me know.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s